Thursday, December 26, 2013

Telecommunications Access for People with Disabilities | FCC.gov

Telecommunications Access for People with Disabilities

The FCC has rules requiring telecommunications equipment manufacturers and service providers to make their products and services accessible to people with disabilities, if such access is readily achievable.  These rules implement Section 255 of the Communications Act.  Where access is not readily achievable, Section 255 requires manufacturers and service providers to make their devices and services compatible with peripheral devices and specialized customer premises equipment that are commonly used by people with disabilities, if such compatibility is readily achievable.  The FCC has determined that interconnected Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) providers must comply with Section 255.

Products and Services Covered Under Section 255

The FCC's rules cover all hardware and software telephone network equipment and customer premises equipment (CPE).  CPE is telecommunications equipment used in the home or office (or other premises) to originate, route or terminate telecommunications.  Examples of CPE are telephones, wireless handsets, fax machines, answering machines and pagers.  CPE that provides both telecommunications and non-telecommunications functions is covered under Section 255 only to the extent it provides telecommunications functions.

The FCC's rules cover basic and special telecommunications services, including regular telephone calls, call waiting, speed dialing, call forwarding, computer-provided directory assistance, call monitoring, caller identification, call tracing and repeat dialing.  In addition, the rules cover interactive voice response (IVR) systems and voice mail.  IVR systems are phone systems that provide callers with menus of choices.

Definitions

Accessible:  A product or service is deemed accessible if it provides accessible input, control and mechanical functions, as well as accessible output, display and control functions.  For example, a pager that has both audio and visual controls for inputting information, as well as both audio and visual methods for retrieving messages, would be accessible to a person who is blind or deaf.

Usable:  For a product or service to be usable, people with disabilities must be able to learn about and operate the product's or service's features effectively.  This requirement includes providing access to information and documentation for the product or service, including instructions and user guides.  In addition, companies must provide functionally equivalent access to support services, such as technical support hotlines and databases, call centers, service centers, repair services and billing services.

Compatible:  The FCC requires that, where accessibility is not readily achievable, a product or service must be made compatible with peripheral devices or specialized customer premises equipment (SCPE), if compatibility is readily achievable.  Peripheral devices are devices that help make telecommunications products and services accessible to individuals with disabilities. Examples are teletypewriters (TTYs), visual signaling devices and amplifiers.  SCPE includes equipment, commonly used at the premises of a person with a disability, to achieve access in the origination, routing or termination of calls and other telecommunications contacts.  Direct-connect TTYs (TTYs that connect directly to the telephone network) are considered to be SCPE.  Assistive technology devices, such as hearing aids or eyeglasses, that have a broad application outside the telecommunications context, are not themselves peripheral equipment or SCPE, even if they are used in conjunction with peripheral equipment or SCPE.  To achieve compatibility, the FCC rules require:

  • external electronic access to all information and control mechanisms;
  • a connection point for external audio processing devices;
  • the ability to connect with TTYs; and
  • the ability to use TTY signals.
Identifying Access Needs

Companies should engage in a number of activities to identify barriers to accessibility and usability.  For example:

  • When conducting market research, product design, testing, pilot demonstrations and  product trials, companies should include individuals with disabilities in target groups for such activities;
  • Companies should work cooperatively with disability-related organizations; and
  • Companies should undertake reasonable efforts to test access solutions with people with disabilities.
When Must Manufacturers and Service Providers Evaluate Access Needs?

Manufacturers and service providers must evaluate the accessibility, usability and compatibility of their equipment and services as early and consistently as possible throughout their design, development and manufacture.  In addition, companies must review their products for accessibility at every "natural opportunity," including when they re-design products, upgrade services, or significantly change the way they group together product and service packages.  Cosmetic changes that do not change the product's actual design, such as changes in the color, make, model name or designation of a product, may not trigger the need to reevaluate access.

Do Companies Need to Review All of Their Products and Services for Accessibility and Usability?

Yes. Accessibility and usability must be assessed for individual products and services. Accessibility features that can be incorporated into the design of products or services with very little or no difficulty or expense must be put in each and every product or service. When it is not readily achievable to incorporate accessibility features into every product or service, companies may distribute access features across product or service lines, so long as the companies implement all features that are readily achievable.

How Will the FCC Determine Which Actions Are Readily Achievable?

The "readily achievable" standard requires companies to incorporate access features that are easily accomplishable without much difficulty or expense.  In determining what is readily achievable, companies must balance the costs and nature of the access required with their available resources.  Companies that have great resources will need to do more to achieve access than companies with smaller budgets.   

The FCC will make readily achievable determinations on a case-by-case basis.  A company may not need to provide access when the access feature would so fundamentally alter the product that it would substantially reduce the functionality of the product, make some features unusable, substantially impede or deter use of the product by other individuals, or substantially and materially alter the shape, size or weight of the product.  Similarly, a company is not obligated to incorporate an access feature that is not technically possible.  Companies wishing to use these defenses, however, must provide evidence to back up their positions.

Is Network Architecture Covered by the FCC's Section 255 Rules?

In addition to covering equipment and services, the FCC's rules require network architecture to be designed in a way that does not hinder access by people with disabilities.  Network architecture covers the public switched telephone network, and includes hardware or software databases associated with routing telecommunications services.

How Can I Contact Manufacturers and Service Providers About Access Concerns?

Although not required to do so, you may want to contact a manufacturer or service provider before filing a complaint with the FCC. Telecommunications service providers and equipment manufacturers must provide the FCC with the name and contact information of the person (or persons) in their companies who are authorized to resolve accessibility complaints. The FCC makes this information available to consumers who want to contact the company's customer care representative directly about accessibility questions, concerns, or complaints. You can find this contact information on the FCC's website, by sending an email to dro@fcc.gov, or by calling 202-418-2517 (voice) or 202-418-2922(TTY).

Filing a Complaint with the FCC

To implement the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 (CVAA), the FCC changed the way it handles complaints about access to telecommunications services and equipment.

Before an informal complaint can be filed, consumers with disabilities (or their representatives) must request assistance from the FCC Disability Rights Office. The Disability Rights Office will work with the consumer and the company for at least 30 days to try to resolve the accessibility problem. There is no charge for this assistance. 

The best way to provide the information that the Disability Rights Office needs to assist you, is to complete the Request for Dispute Assistance (RDA Form) online. You may also download or print the RDA Form. If you use the latter method, complete and submit your downloaded/printed request and any supporting documentation to the Disability Rights Office by email to dro@fcc.gov, by fax to 202-418-0037, or by mail to:

Federal Communications Commission
Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau
Disability Rights Office
445 12th Street, SW
Washington, D.C.  20554

If you are unable to obtain or use an RDA Form, your request for assistance should include the following:

  • your contact information
    • your name, address, telephone number, and email address
    • if communication by telephone or email is not accessible to you, your preferred method of communication
  • information about your accessibility problem
    • the name of the manufacturer or service provider
    • the type of device, model number, and any software involved
    • when you purchased, acquired, or used (or tried to purchase, acquire, or use) the service or equipment
    • when you became aware of the accessibility problem
    • the way the service or equipment is not accessible to or usable by you
    • if you contacted the company about your accessibility problem, how the company responded
    • what you want the company to do to resolve your accessibility problem
    • any other information or documentation you think may help describe or resolve your accessibility problem

Your Request for Dispute Assistance will be assigned a case number.  If your accessibility problem is not resolved in 30 days, you have two choices: 

  1. you may request an additional 30 days for assistance to try to resolve your accessibility problem; or
  2. you may file an informal complaint about the accessibility problem with the FCC Enforcement Bureau. 

To request an additional 30 days or file an informal complaint, contact the Disability Rights Office at 202-418-2517 (voice) or 202-418-2922 (TTY), by email to dro@fcc.gov, by fax to202-418-0037, or by mail to the address above. You will need to provide your last name, zip code, and your Request for Dispute Assistance case number. If you take no action for 60 days after the 30-day time period ends, your case will be closed. 

For More Information

For more information about FCC programs to promote telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.  For information about other telecommunications issues, visit the FCC's Consumer website, or contact the FCC's Consumer Center by calling 1-888-CALL-FCC (1-888-225-5322) voice or 1-888-TELL-FCC (1-888-835-5322) TTY; faxing 1-866-418-0232; or writing to:

Federal Communications Commission
Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau
Consumer Inquiries and Complaints Division
445 12th Street, SW
Washington, D.C.  20554

For this or any other consumer publication in an accessible format (electronic ASCII text, Braille, large print or audio), please write or call us at the address or phone number above, or send an email to FCC504@fcc.gov.

This document is for consumer education purposes only and is not intended to affect any proceedings or cases involving this subject matter or related issues.

Print Out

Telecommunications Access for People with Disabilities Guide (pdf)

Updated: October 30, 2013
Elyssa D. Durant © DailyDDoSe™ 2007-2008

File Sizes for Kindle Books—The Text, the Images, and the Cover Images

File Sizes for Kindle Books

The Text, the Images, and the Cover Image

By

Some of the most common questions I get about building Kindle books regards file sizes: what is the right size for a Kindle book? What's the maximum size for a cover image? How big should internal images be? The answer to all of these questions really is "it depends." It depends upon the length of your book, the number of images, and who you are targeting your book at.

Size of Your Books

Amazon estimates the average size of a Kindle book to be around 2KB per page, including the cover image and any internal images. But before you panic thinking that your book is much larger than that, there are some things to consider:

  • This number is an average, and it is used primrily by Amazon to give estimates as to how many books a given Kindle ereader can hold. In other words, it's a marketing number.
  • This number is also not a requirement or even a recommendation. Some books will be larger and others smaller, it's just the nature of books.
  • Amazon also assumes that most of their books are going to be fiction, without a lot of internal images. But your readers will expect books with a lot of images to be larger than all-text books.

In fact, the only recommendation that Amazon provides is for authors using the KDP (Kindle Direct Publishing) tool. Amazon says "The maximum file size for conversion through Amazon KDP is 50MB." If you create a book that is larger than 50MB it may not convert to KDP or it may cause delays in conversion.

Ebooks are Not Web Pages

If you've been building web pages for any amount of time, then you are probably very aware of file sizes and download speeds. This is because web pages need to be kept as small as possible to keep download times low. If a customer clicks on a link to a web page and it takes more than 20–30 seconds to download, most people will simply hit the back button and not return to the site.

This is not the same with ebooks. It's easy to think that ebooks will have the same effect, especially if you started by building your ebook in HTML. But this is incorrect. When a customer purchases an ebook, it is delivered to their ebook reader over the internet. The larger the file size, the longer it will take a book to download to the device. But even if it takes an hour for the book to load onto the device, it will be there eventually, even if the customer has long forgotten that they bought it. When the customer returns to their device library, they will see your book right there.

Most customers won't ever notice how long it takes a book to download. But you should be aware that some customers will notice and a long load time might be reflected in their review after they finish reading it. But on the other hand, if the book has lots of pictures they might expect a longer download time.

What About Images?

There are two types of images associated with Kindle books: images inside the book and the cover image. File sizes for these two types of images are very different.

Internal Images Images inside the book are the most common reason a Kindle book might be extremely large. There is no Amazon-specific recommendation for how large your internal images should be. I recommend using JPG images that are no more than 127KB each, but even this is just a guideline. If you need internal images to be larger, then make them larger. But remember that large images make your entire book larger, and take longer to download.

Cover Images Amazon's recommendation for cover images is "For best quality, your image would be 1563 pixels on the shortest side and 2500 pixels on the longest side." They don't say anything about file size. Like with the book itself, there are probably file sizes that won't upload to KDP, but that size is certainly similar to the 50MB total file size. And if you cannot create a cover image that is smaller than 50MB (heck, even 2MB!) then you might be in the wrong business.

The Last Thing to Consider—The Kindle Devices Themselves

You might be thinking "but what if my book is too big to fit?" The reality is that this isn't going to be a problem. Kindle devices come with 2GB (or more) of on-device storage, and while not all of that is available for books, about 60% or more is. Even if your book is 49.9MB that is still significantly smaller than even the smallest device can hold.

Yes, it is possible that your customer will have already downloaded and installed thousands of books and thus not have room for yours, but no customer will blame you for their hoarding tendencies. In fact, they probably already know they have too many books on their device even if yours fits without a problem.

Don't Worry Too Much About File Sizes for Your Kindle Books

If you are selling your book on Amazon, then you shouldn't worry too much about how large your Kindle books are. They will download in the background and your customers will have the book eventually. Smaller is better, but your books and images should be the size that is right for your book and no smaller.

The only time you might worry about the file size is if you are participating in the Amazon 70% royalty option. With that option, Amazon charges a fee per MB every time your book is downloaded. The current cost in the U.S. is $0.15 per MB, and there are other rates for sales in other countries/languages. Check the Amazon pricing page for the most up-to-date prices and costs.



^ed

Wednesday, December 25, 2013

Behaviour of the serial bully: attention seeker, wannabe, guru and sociopath including industrial psychopath, corporate psychopath and workplace psychopath

bullyonline logo

serial, bully, profile, psychopath, psychopathic, sociopath, sociopathic, behaviour, behavior, signs, symptoms, corporate, workplace, industrial, manipulator, intimidate, attention, seeker, wannabe, guru, administrative, psychos, suits, snakes, work, workplace, bullying, antisocial
Constant criticism, nit-picking, no empathy, control freak, denial, charm, glib, compulsive liar, devious, manipulative? Read this

Serial Bully Character Traits

on this page...

The Bully's Underlying AgendaImmaturity
Guidance for readersInappropriate Body Language
Plausible Charisma, Charm and EmpathyLack of Conscience
Selective GenerosityUnreliability and Dishonesty
ArroganceDuplicity
Contempt for OthersHypocrisy
Manipulation and ControlProjection
IntellectEvasiveness
Facile Assertions

Self preservation

On other pages:

Serial bully attitudes to life and work
Serial Bully Introduction

The Bully's Underlying Agenda

In a work context, people who trust, rely on and confide in each other have needs, e.g.

  • to have some work done, service rendered or commodity supplied (especially in the case of a client or employer);
  • to be trusted and respected;
  • to be helped, supported and developed;
  • to develop and preserve a good reputation;
  • to be able to earn a regular income

Bullies see these needs as vulnerabilities which they seek out and exploit for personal gain and sometimes for gratification. Businesses, stakeholders and colleagues all have similar needs and are all therefore potential targets.

The sort of bullies we are describing are charlatans who use clever words and actions (rather than merit) to get into a position where they are trusted, relied upon, confided in and so on. Bullies find ways of appearing capable of being able to satisfy such desires or needs, but once they have the other person's trust and confidence, they take what they can for as long as they can, ditching people along the way, and then and walk away when there is nothing left to take. They can get away with it for years because of yet another common need: The need to trust the bully. People do not want to believe they are being exploited and so they tend to make up excuses for and put up with the bully. Sometimes it is out of genuine ignorance, and sometimes it is denial on the target's part, not wanting to admit that they've been taken for a ride. Bullies exploit this vulnerability, again with convincing explanations and by manipulating people's perceptions, to remain in a position where they are free to continue without any real prospect of being held accountable for their actions. Often, because they come out of disputes as "winners", their ability to get away with further exploitation is increased.

Guidance for readers

Tim Field revealed that the character traits below existed in people who were serial exploiters. Readers should note carefully that possessing some of these character traits does not make a person into a "serial bully". The purpose of publishing these character traits is not to provide material with which a reader can demonise, or render as untrustworthy, an innocent colleague. It does, however, help readers understand what they can expect to find in the character that is responsible for behaviour described elsewhere in this website as bullying. Even when dealing with the person you think is bullying you, do your best to avoid hurtful criticism and provocative language. Do not allow the strength of your convictions to betray you into making statements or allegations that are unfair or untrue. Think it possible that you may be mistaken and remain objective. Even if you are certain that someone's behaviour is unjustifiable and unfair, still do your best to treat them fairly.

One practical reason for this advice is that you and the bully and the dispute will be observed by others. Their opinion matters most if the dispute is to be resolved fairly. It is therefore important that you outshine the bully in the single area that they cannot function: treating an adversary assertively, i.e. with fairness.

Another practical reason is that if your response to being bullied involves conduct that could be directly interpreted or twisted around and interpreted as bullying, you risk losing whatever moral advantage you had over the bully. Do not treat anyone, whatever they have done, in a way that would justify them using material from this website to describe your actions and character.

Plausible Charisma, Charm and Empathy

Charisma is a personal quality often attributed to leaders who arouse popular devotion and enthusiasm. Sometimes it is achieved through the leader's merit, and sometimes through the followers' fear of the consequences of not being devoted and enthusiastic. The more respectful people are of the charismatic leader, the less likely they are to experience the consequences of not being seen as respectful. Remember that some charismatic leaders are respected because of their genuine merit and integrity.

  • People have described serial bullies as "charming", and through this "charm", they can convince managers, employers, investigators and courts that they are wonderful people. When peers, superiors or others are present, they seem plausible and convincing. Of course, they are not charming to the people they victimise.
  • Some serial bullies may appear superficially competent and professional at their job. Much of their plausibility, normal appearance and apparently dynamic character is the result of mimicry, repetition and regurgitation. They extol the virtues of the latest management fads and use jargon to demonstrate that their way of doing things is en vogue.
  • Charismatic, charming serial bullies are capable of anticipating what people want to hear, and then saying it. By applying this skill, they convince others to follow and support them. They portray themselves and are talked about by their disciples as clever, successful, important, wonderful, kind, caring and compassionate people.
  • Although they usually have little concept of empathy, they can use charm and mimicry to compensate. However, their attempts at empathy are superficial, amateur, often inappropriately timed or over the top. Rather than being motivated by genuine concern, such attempts are to make the bully look good in front of witnesses.
  • Some serial bullies form or join lots of committees. This impresses followers and casual observers by making the bully look busy and important, and it allows them to pass the hours without being required to contribute much if any work.

Selective Generosity

Bullies are not exclusively mean, but they are selective about it, being mean, officious and inappropriately inflexible some of the time, but generous, relaxed and very accomodating at other times. They motivate some people with the prospect of reward, and others by manipulating their fear, anger and guilt.

  • A bully might be mean and offhand to the target one day, but disarmingly generous the next. This is a means of psychological control achieved by balancing the target's anger, fear, trust and respect of the bully.
  • They can respond to requests for help either with impatience and aggression (if no-one is looking), or with a fulsome and effusive attempt at empathy (if witnesses are present).
  • Bullies cannot be trusted with money. Even if they are selectively generous, their net aim is always to take, and never to give;
  • They are incapable of reciprocity, ie unable and unwilling to reciprocate any positive gesture.
  • They can be insensitive, often callously indifferent to the needs of others, especially when others are in some difficulty.
  • Bullies are by default ungrateful people and rarely (if ever) say "thank you" or "well done", except for show, as a means of control.

Arrogance

Arrogance is having, or displaying, a sense of overbearing self-worth or self-importance.

  • Serial bullies are frequently self-opinionated and display arrogance, audacity, a superior sense of entitlement, and appear to have a sense of invulnerability and untouchability. They take risks that others would regard as foolhardy.
  • They can have an unhealthy need to feel recognised and wanted, which draws them to positions of power, which they then go on to abuse.
  • Serial bullies holding positions that require leadership qualities appear convinced of their superiority and have an overbearing belief in their qualities of leadership. In simple terms, they are often haughty, high-handed "know-it-alls" who are not ashamed to tell others how good they are.
  • They often act out of gratification and self-interest only, often using and hiding behind the employer;
  • As leaders they are autocratic and dictatorial. Most of their actions, most of the time, are dictated by self-interest, self-aggrandisement and self-preservation.
  • Extrovert bullies tend to be shouters and screamers, are highly visible, and bully from the front.
  • Serial Bullies sometimes display a seemingly limitless energy, especially when engaged in attention-seeking activities or evading accountability.

Contempt for Others

Bullies look out for and exploit others' vulnerabilities for personal gain or gratification. Other people are seen as objects to be exploited. Also:-

  • Serial Bullies often hold deep prejudices relating to others' gender, sexual orientation, culture, religious beliefs, race, and other personal characterisitics, but where they know it is unlawful to exhibit such prejudices, they strive to keep them under wraps. This prejudice can extend to a hatred of sectors of society, e.g. ethnic minorities, disabled people, etc, or to departments in their organisation, or of professions that are aware of and doing something about bullying, such as the police, psychologists, psychiatrists, charities, social workers, counsellors, therapists etc.
  • Bullies that are in a job that they cannot do will resent anyone who makes demands on them, and that can include clients, suppliers, superiors and subordinates. They attempt to conceal their resentment but every so often they will make a gaff that reveals disdain or contempt for their colleagues. The frustration arising from general self-restraint may be a reason for venting open aggression on one target at a time.
  • When called upon to share or address the needs and concerns of others, they respond with impatience, irritability and aggression.
  • Serial bullies detest anyone more competent or popular than themselves. They are unable (or refuse) to praise or value others' achievements, ofen being scornful, and sometimes refuse to acknowledge other's existence. Thier compulsive need to criticise anyone or anything extends to finding fault with the things other people have done right.
  • When in a position of power, Serial Bullies appear to gain gratification from denying people what they are entitled to. They are unwilling to conform to societal norms, thinking that rules, regulations, procedures and laws don't apply to them, but reprimanding others for perceived failures to comply.
  • They see others as a threat; the threat seems to comprise a fear of exposure of inadequacy, and often borders on paranoia;
  • They despise anyone who can see through their deception and their mask of normality;
  • Bullies are unforgiving and often seize on and exploit others' mistakes or perceived mistakes. If crossed or unwittingly criticised, bullies can hold grudges for long periods and act on them later, eg by denying their transgressor a promotion or by picking them for redundancy - sometimes years later.
  • When addressing perceived shortcomings in others, bullies use criticism and humiliation. This approach limits people by controlling and subjugating them, but it does not bring about any performance enhancement.

Manipulation and Control

Serial bullies survive and bully people by managing others' attitudes and allegiances, by indoctrination to an extent, but mainly by manuipulating emotions, especially (in targets) fear, anger and guilt and (in others) fear, anger and greed. This is achieved by being untruthful and drawing people into believing their fabricated version of reality which, in its most basic form, is achieved by:

  • using intimidation and criticism to make targets feel isolated and hopeless;
  • using gossip, back-stabbing and falsehood to undermine and discredit targets and others;
  • plagiarising and taking credit for others' work, denial, retaliation and feigned victimhood to make the bully look good.

Sometimes manipulation of minds requires manipulation of documents and records. A bully may (or may have someone else) alter, delete or create as necessary any document or record, especially if doing so would damage someone else's reputation or protect the bully from being held accountable for his or her actions. Serial Bullies are often perceived as "control freaks", wanting to control not just events, but what others say, do, think and believe. This can emerge if a person raises a controversial topic and is immediately attacked for doing so and restricted or prevented from continuing. They may impose rules, regulations, laws etc and insist on adherence thereto, regardless of their relevance or efficacy.

Manipulating perceptions of intelligent people is not easy and demands constant effort, which can include:-

  • being a divisive and disruptive influence so that their department becomes dysfunctional and inefficient, and then "reorganising" it. In the chaos, no-one knows what is going on and relies on the bully for information.
  • provoking a target into giving an emotional or irrational response, and then seizing on it as evidence of the target's impropriety.
  • being unpredictably and disarmingly pleasant, especially if being unmasked in front of witnesses - this plays on people's sympathies and exploits people's guilt;
  • introvert bullies - the most dangerous types - tend to sit in the background and recruit others to do the bullying for them.

Intellect

In trying to be popular, Serial bullies like to be perceived as having a superior intelligence. However, by trying too hard, they can appear intellectually dysfunctional.



    http://www.bullyonline.org/workbully/serial_character.htm


    Elyssa D. Durant © DailyDDoSe™ © 2013

    Monday, December 23, 2013

    Stereotypes About Welfare Recipients' Spending Habits Are Wrong

    Stereotypes About Welfare Recipients’ Spending Habits Are Wrong

    December 22nd 2013

    Written by Bryce Covert

    The stereotype of the low-income people enrolled in government programs is that they spend the money on frivolities and are unwise with their budgets. But the data proves otherwise. Families who receive public benefits such as housing assistance, welfare cash assistance, food stamps, Medicaid, and Social Security Income (SSI) for the disabled or low-income elderly have much smaller spending budgets than those who don’t receive benefits and spend a bigger portion on the basics such as food, housing, and transportation, according to an analysis by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    On average, families who are enrolled in these public programs spend less than half of what families who aren’t enrolled spend. They also put a bigger percentage of that money toward food, housing, and transportation, devoting 77 percent of their budgets to these necessities compared to about 65 percent for other families. Meanwhile, they spend less, on average, on some things thought to be luxuries like eating out and entertainment. A family that doesn’t get public benefits spends 4.5 percent of its budget on “food away from home,” while a two-parent family who gets benefits spends 4 percent of its budget on eating out and a single parent spends 3.6 percent. “Food away from home spending was higher in both dollar amount and percent of total spending among families not receiving assistance,” the report notes. Families who don’t need assistance also spend more on entertainment in both dollar and percentage terms and devote more of their budgets to “other” expenses.

    Families who receive benefits are also more likely to go without higher priced items like houses and cars. Just 3 percent of families who don’t get benefits went without a car, compared to nearly a quarter of those on the rolls. On average, a family that isn’t enrolled in public programs has about two cars, while a family that is enrolled has about one. Meanwhile, more than three-quarters of families not receiving assistance are homeowners, while the opposite is true for families who do need the support: just about three-quarters are renters instead of homeowners.

    And while the stereotype of the “welfare queen” is a woman who has more children to increase the benefits she gets from government programs, families who are enrolled look similar to those who aren’t. “Average family size was the same (3.7 persons), whether or not a family received assistance,” the report notes.

    In reality, many of these benefits that families rely on are paltry and, worse, have recently shrunk. The value of benefits from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program (TANF), formerly known as welfare, have fallen so that their purchasing power is less than what it was in 1996 for the vast majority of recipients. A family of three that relies solely on TANF won’t be able to make market rent for a two-bedroom apartment and will live at just 50 percent of the poverty line, or $9,765 a year. Food stamps from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) were reduced in November to an average of less than $1.40 a meal and more cuts are likely on their wayafter Congress agrees to a new farm bill. Housing assistance from the Section 8 rental voucher program got hammered by sequestration and local authorities had to rescind vouchers from those who had gotten off waiting lists, freeze the lists, and reduce the amount of rent each voucher would cover.

    Still, these programs represent a vital lifeline. Government programs such as SNAP, SSI, housing assistance, cash assistance, and others kept millions out of poverty last year.

    This post was originally published inThinkProgress


    New mobile updates for Android, iPhone and mobile web

    New mobile updates for Android, iPhone and mobile web
    Twitter Blog


    We just released a new version of Twitter for Android. Its new design reflects a native Android experience: wider and taller timelines that fill the screen, a flat navigation bar, tap and hold for quick actions, and more. You can now quickly navigate between tabs by swiping across your screen. And as you type your Tweet or search, you'll see username and hashtag suggestions, making it easier to connect with friends and join conversations.

    In addition to the Android app, we've also updated Twitter for iPhone and mobile.twitter.com. All three mobile apps, plus twitter.com, now show more types of content in expanded Tweets: photo galleries, apps and product listings.

    You'll also see a new link right below content that is shared from another mobile app, such as Foursquare or Path.


    The link lets you open or download the app right from the Tweet, depending on whether or not you have it installed. As an example, if you expand a Tweet to view a photo from Flickr, you can tap the link to open the photo in Flickr. If you don't yet have the Flickr app on your phone, you can tap to install it from the Tweet.

    These updates, which are rolling out to users over the next several days, are part of our ongoing effort to make it easier for you to connect with interesting and relevant content on Twitter. If you're interested in the under-the-hood details, there are more on our Developer blog.

    You can download these updates from the Google Play or App Store.

    Posted by Jonathan Le (@jle)
    Technical Lead, Android

    Original Article: http://blog.twitter.com/2013/04/new-mobile-updates-for-android-iphone.html


    ^ed

    Saturday, December 21, 2013

    SIM Crypto Hijack Threatens Millions

    Mobe SIM crypto hijack threatens millions: Here's HOW IT WORKS

    July 22nd 2013

    You'll kick yourself when you know how

    Analysis A German researcher reckons he can take control of your phone's SIM card and hijack the handset by cracking the encryption on the device.

    But he's not alone: network operators have long been able to do just that, and a careful look at how that's possible makes the long-standing security of GSM phone networks all the more remarkable.

    GSM networks are secured by shared secrets. A unique cryptographic key is issued to each subscriber and embedded in their phone's SIM card; a copy of that key is held by the network allowing mutual authentication by symmetric encryption (the same key is used at both ends).

    Despite successful assaults on other parts of the GSM infrastructure those private keys have remained beyond the grasp of hackers, at least until now.

    Pedigree security researcher Karsten Nohl has apparently discovered two unrelated flaws in implementations of the GSM standard that (when combined) could leave millions of SIM cards vulnerable to attack. Such attacks could permit call interception, and threaten the security of NFC applications (such as pay by wave) just as the tech is on the cusp of going mainstream.

    Getting the secret key off a SIM isn't easy - but increases in computing power have combined with poor implementations to create the first flaw exploited by Nohl, which reveals the secret key that should be known only to the network operator and the SIM.

    Nohl's crack uses an SMS message addressed to the SIM, and unseen by the user. This is normal enough; these messages come in four classes (0-3) addressed to the user, the handset, the SIM, and a tethered device respectively. Class 0 is the one we all know and love, but Class 2 (addressed to the SIM) remains surprisingly popular even if the other classes are all but forgotten.

    The most common Class 2 message contains changes to the list of preferred roaming partners, to reflect new deals between operators, but the Global Platform standard permits anything, even the entire operating system, to be changed using signed Class 2 messages.

    Such radical updates are rare, but they have happened and are secured using that shared secret, so knowledge of the key confers significant power.

    This should already be setting off alarm bells

    Nohl's crack starts with a malformed Class 2 message. Anyone can send such a message using a software SMS Centre (SMSC), or even an old handset as some permitted a user-selected class. That message is rejected by the receiving SIM as it's not signed, usually the message is just discarded but some SIMs apparently respond with a digitally signed error message that can be used to reveal their secret key.

    Digital signatures shouldn't reveal the keys used to sign them; that would defeat the object, but in this case it seems that some do.

    The digital signature sent over with the error message is a one-way hash: a fixed-length summary of the message that is generated by the phone using the secret key.

    This allows the receiver of the message to verify it is genuine and trustworthy: the receiver calculates a hash value using its copy of the secret key and the received message data. If that calculated value matches the hash included with the message then all is well - the secret keys at both ends must match.

    But Nohl's team has a rainbow table to deduce the secret key from the signature.

    The error message is a standard one - it doesn't change between handsets - so by generating a list of every possible key value, a rainbow table of every possible hash value can be calculated for this one particular message. So an attacker simply takes the signature from the phone and looks it up in the rainbow to discover the secret key.

    Every bit of a key doubles the size of the rainbow table, and such techniques rapidly become impractical as keys get bigger, but some older SIMs are using 56-bit keys and old-style DES encryption which combines to make the rainbow technique viable, and where that happens the secret key can be quickly discovered.

    Once you have the key, you can start signing your own command SMS messages to control a targeted mobile.

    What can be done?

    Operators can change the SIMs, and update the encryption, but users are surprisingly reluctant to slot a new SIM into their handsets - they become quite emotional about it, proud to be using decades-old chippery, which stalls upgrade programmes. It's also expensive - adding a dollar to the cost of the SIM may seem like a small deal, but when a network has 10 million customers it becomes a significant expense.

    Quite how many SIMs are using 56DES we don't know; Kohl reckons to have tried a thousand over the last year or two and discovered a quarter are vulnerable. There's no easy way to discover if a specific SIM is using 56DES, the operators store the information along with the keys, but the SIM won't talk about the subject.

    Armed with a key our miscreant can reprogram the SIM to do just about anything - redirect SMS messages, change the preferred network operator, run up enormous bills to premium-rate numbers and authenticate payments through services such as PayForIt. Modern SIMs can request an internet connection, furnished by the handset and generally without user interaction, through which our attacker can cause all sorts of mischief - though to get at the users' bank details he'll need Nohl's second flaw.

    Almost all SIMs (and credit cards) use JavaCard, a relation of Java still owned by Oracle, but having little in common with the cross-platform interpreted language beyond a bit of syntax. JavaCard is an operating system, not a language, and one which keeps applications (Cardlets, in the parlance) separated so they can't talk to each other.

    Nohl claims to have found a flaw in that separation, though he won't be making the details public until next month's Black Hat conference. Combining that flaw with possession of the secret key makes for a potent combination - pay-by-bonk applications, such as the one being launched by EE later this year, rely on the hitherto sacrosanct separation of JavaCard apps, so they'll be a good deal of interest in Nohl's talk from hat wearers of all colours.

    GSM authentication, as opposed to encryption, has proved amazing resilient over the years. A fix for this problem will likely turn up pretty quickly with the ITU and GSMA falling over themselves to be associated with the solution, but if it needs replacement SIMs then that will be a longer process.

    Operators should be quick to send out new SIM cards to customers still using 56DES, but the JavaCard vulnerability may prove harder to patch and we'll get you details of that just as soon as we can. ®

    Last Writes: A Letter from Ned Vizzini

    UNWRITTEN: Last Writes: A Letter to Ned Vizzini

    Unwritten:: A letter to Ned Vizzini




    From: “Ned Vizzini” 
    Hey, sounds like me!  I’m headed towards ruin quick.  Hope all is well

    -------------- Original message ---------

    From: “Ned Vizzini”

    I’m not good, Elyssa. Very depressed.  I was such a different person when I knew you.  But maybe I will be different soon. 

    -------------------------




    From "Elyssa D:

    god ned-- I wish we could talk—based upon what I’ve read (what you’ve posted on line and through your interviews) it seems as though you are going through all the emotions and emotional chaos that I was experiencing the first year we met back in new York.

    Another friend of mine just checked himself into a psych ward after a suicide attempt and I feel so helpless because I care and respect you both so much.

    it is funny because I always thought that if I could just finish that damn book I was working on ten years ago—or just finished law school, my PhD. or any number of things—everything would be okay.

    It confuses me because you finished your book—rob finished law school- I finished nothing.

    A few weeks ago, I “lost my shit” so to speak, came across your interview, and was completely blown away—I used to be the crazy one—now I have my sanity back but nothing else.

    having been through several crises myself, I came to believe that when you see someone in crisis, they become so overwhelmed and confused that they do not know what to do first—and how to dig out of the hole they have dug for themselves.  I decided that rather than asking, I just try to figure it out and give it to them, no questions asked, no thank you necessary.

    How many people have told you, “Call if you there is anything I can do” and when you do call—nothing!  Nothing but disappointment and regret.  So I have decide never to ask somebody what they need—

    Mostly because they don’t even know themselves— hen I came to the realization a few weeks ago that my transient existence is so tangential that no one would notice if I never took another breath—I tried to figure out what I needed so that I could give it to myself.
    So I started going back through my old journals to see if I could identify the missing element of my life—you know that “thing” that would both make it all go away and make all come together so I could be a whole person again.
    That thing is a figment of my imagination.  I used to think it was being loved by a man—I had that.  Wasn’t it.
    Then I thought it was having money.  I had that.  But that wasn’t it either.
    Then I thought it was health insurance—but no, that was not it either.
    Then I thought it would be having that oh-so-critical Ivy League degree.  I have that.  That still wasn't it. 
    So obviously, none of those things could have been “it.”
    The thing I need most, I lost long ago, and that was hope. Perhaps I never really had it at all.

    So I guess some things just can’t be bought, learned, earned, or acquired. 
    I think of the long twisted road, and I remember one of my favorite childhood movies, where a girl named Dorothy was so determined to find her way home after a great storm.  Disillusioned and distracted, Dorothy would not yield to the many obstacles that had been placed in her way.  Determined to meet the great Wizard, she stayed one path. 
    Yes, there were detours, obstacles, and the Wicked Witch of the West.  Each of these obstacles may have taken her of course, yet she never once lost sight of the road home.   She believed in one thing, the Wizard, and his ability to bring her home.  

    Having great faith and determination, she never strayed far off the path to righteousness.  Dorothy had a clearly defined goal, a means to get there, and a bright yellow brick road to guide her.  Through her determination and unyielding faith, Dorothy never once doubted that she was on the right path. 
    In the Wizard of Oz, the yellow brick road may have been the path she was taking, but through her determination and blind faith, she was able to bring others onto the road t enlightenment.
    The lion found his courage; the tin man got a heart.  The scarecrow got some brains—and even Dorothy got what she needed most. 
    Dorothy began her journey looking for one thing.  She needed to get back to place she began, and find her way home. Dorothy teaches us a valuable lesson, but she was lucky enough to know what it was she so desperately longed for... home.
    If all I had to do was click my heals three times and find my way home, well, sadly I would not even know where home is.  Yes, they say home is where the heart is, and perhaps that is part of the problem.  But for some of us, out childhood homes were not places of happiness and nostalgia.  They are places from which we run, searching endlessly for that magical place and can only hope that we have come across a road that is clearly marked to guide us in our destination. 
    Of course, we know there will be that take us off course, and it will up to us to find our way back.  Unfortunately, there is a certain point when we lose our direction and we lose our faith.  As I grew older, I came to realize recognize that my feeling of detachment went far beyond having a dysfunctional childhood a broken family life that even my sister and I never lived in the same house for more than a year or so in the summertime.

    So no matter how long I have been in Nashville, in many ways I am, in fact still a stranger.  I am a stranger because homeless is a state of mind. 
    In my mind, I like to think a home is a place of acceptance, shelter, and a place you can find forgiveness, comfort and recognition.  For most, going home means to reconnect in a way so that you are reminded that you have something, someone, who will always have your back. 
    Homer represents more than a structure; it represents a strong foundation that will always be there whenever you need to feel safety and comfort.  For me safety is marked by the boundaries that are supposed to keep me safe and protected. 
    So this is my home.  I don’t necessarily feel safe here, but I do feel consistent.  I do not have to worry that I will be forced to switch schools, neighbors or friends every six months just because my parents could not get it right.  What they failed to realize is just how very wrong it really was.  Changing schools, changing friends, changing siblings; changing myself just enough each time so that I could fit in. But after 16 years of constant change, I never got the opportunity to find out anything real about myself.  Even my name was changed when I moved--- dad called me Liz, and my mother called herself any number of last names as she desperately tried to hold on to her youth, her beauty, and delusional fantasies of entitlement and sacrifice that I think she may actually believe. 

    I have never had plastic surgery, could not afford it anyway, but what do have is a clear memory, vivid nightmares, and a place of my own.  What I also realize, is that until I can live free from fear and dependence, I will never truly be able to know what it feels like to be at home.  If home is where the heart is, then homelessness is clearly just a state of mind.  And today I have some hope that I might someday no longer feel just as homeless at home.  So now I know more than ever, that homelessness is a far more than a concrete structure or family property. 
    I will always feel a little homeless at home.  It is knowing that you are the thing that remains constant—regardless of any dreams I may have, I will never have the constant I would need to get bring a child into this world--- as much I  would like to. 

    I envy those who feel they have so much in their lives that they can trust without any reservation that the world is a loving enough place they want to share with a child. Especially a child of their own.  No, my mother told me long, long time ago, that I can never have children.  

    She also told me last year, that I could not have a dog.  My own mother does not think I am capable of raising a puppy.  Maybe she’s right.  She did put her fears into action when she once donated my cat of 14 years to the animal shelter under someone else name so that I truly was left without any ties to the condo I stayed in for a few short months while I tried to come up with a plan to take him and myself far from a place where we could be safe and live free. 

    I adopted him back from the animal shelter 40 miles out after learning that she had used someone else’s name at the agency so I could not find him on my own.

    I will not look elsewhere to find the essentials things healthy children receive that in turn makes them healthy adults. 
    I will never be “healthy” but I do think I wish I could give more than what I have received.  I regret never being the kind of “community member" I think I could have been, and I doubt I will get over the sheer humiliation of having to love this way for so many years when I should have been doing so much more.
    in having truly been able to do the great things for society that I believe I could, but I can’t regret not giving no longer need constant reassurance, recognition, or validation, but I will always question whether things could have been different if only one person had taken the time to show me I was worth it.  That I deserved more than what I could actually afford and realize that I do give so much in so many other ways.  

    The ways that people cannot calculate or see just how badly the ones who received them needed those gifts.  It was the little things.  It was Kody, it was Desiree, but above all else, it was me setting goals, the feelings of that my feeling I would never and was no longer subject to bi-annual custody disputes and shifts  and us to realize that homelessness is merely a state of mind. 

    Where would I go?  10 years “down the road” and now, more than ever, I realize I am truly and deeply, “homeless at home.”  
    You see it is not so much that I doubt myself, I just don’t trust that people will not do horrible things even if that means doing nothing at all. 
    I do have much love to give.  Actually too much.  So much that it often pours out of me in inappropriate sentimentality.  I know when I need to keep to myself, and I know when my anxieties starts to make others a little anxious.  I know because as I see you react to me be anxious, it only makes me that much worse. It is one of my worst, but at times sometimes, that sensitivity is also at times a wonderful attribute and god given gift.

    But should that prevent me from getting out into the world just because other people think I should be don’t like me … that’s not my job.
    I have spent more than half of my life in self-imposed isolation, and the other half wondering how I can be less annoying and high strung so others would want me around.  The sad truth is, yes, I am annoying, but also, I am perceptive and very aware.  

    Sometimes I do it purpose. 
    I should not have to live in isolation because I have nervous tics or sometimes say the wrong thing.  But regardless of what people seem to think about welfare recipients being lazy bums guess what—FUCK you right back.   I have chosen to keep to myself just in case I really am so horrible to be around and my parents were right. Even my own mother thinks I would be better off dead.
    and the rest is still unwritten... 

    Elyssa D. Durant, Ed.M. © 2008-2013

    Remembering Ned Vizzini





    It hit me like an electric shock last night to find out that my friend, the writer Ned Vizzini, took his own life in New York yesterday at age 32. He was one of the most enthusiastic, vibrant people I knew; his classic YA novel It's Kind of a Funny Story (which was adapted into a film in 2010) was based on Ned's own stay in a psychiatric hospital after he was gripped by suicidal thoughts in his early twenties, but that still doesn't make it any easier to believe that those feelings bested him now, because when I think of Ned, I think of that happy, crooked smile that you barely had to coax out of him.

    I met Ned very randomly at a Human Rights Watch event a few years ago. All of his books (including Be More Chill andThe Other Normals) are about outsiders, and at this tony private home in the Hollywood Hills, packed with polished and well-heeled gay activists, Ned was a shaggy outsider indeed: He was a little unkempt, a little bit loud, and, incidentally, the only straight guy there. But I immediately sensed that I had so much more in common with him than with anyone else at the party, and Ned and I hit it off so quickly that I think we were both surprised. It was eerie how in sync we were on every single pop-culture topic imaginable; it felt like a variation on the mirror scene in Duck Soup, where I would start a topic of conversation — "Can we talk for a second about Jennifer Connelly's introduction in The Rocketeer … " — and then he would flawlessly mirror me and continue it: " … with the pantyhose and the lipstick and the eyebrows? I know!"

    Ever since, we had a habit of meeting up at one of the oldest restaurants in Los Angeles, the Tam O'Shanter, to fill each other in on major life developments (Ned, a new father, had begun writing a YA series with original Harry Potter director Chris Columbus and was ascending through the TV writer ranks on shows likeTeen WolfLast Resort, and the upcoming Alfonso Cuarón series Believe) but mostly to experience that giddy thrill that comes from talking to someone who knows every single goddamn thing that you do. Ned was a family man who'd grown up in Park Slope and I was an unmarried gay guy who'd never lived anywhere but Southern California, but when we would nerd out about The Girl With the Silver Eyes by Willo Davis Roberts or pore delightedly through a PDF I'd found of the first issue of Nintendo Power, we might as well have shared the same brain.

    And he was a great storyteller. Ned had a full-blown anecdote for every subject imaginable, and for being such a nice guy, he wasn't afraid to gossip. I remember a story he told me about the TV star who'd thrown a fit on set, unwilling to say the lines Ned had written for him. It was a genuinely juicy bit of news — this soft-spoken actor is the last person you would have expected to go full-diva — and yet, as Ned continued telling the story, he couldn't help but rationalize the guy's behavior. "I mean, he's the one who has to give the performance, not me," Ned said. "And for all I know, he's having some trouble in his life right now and maybe he just needed to lash out." Ned was bending over backwards to make me feel sympathetic for this actor who'd dismissed Ned's script as a piece of shit, and I frowned. "Ned," I said firmly, "You are absolutely ruining this good gossip right now." But that wasn't what it was. I realized later that Ned simply couldn't tell a story without rendering a character in three dimensions.

    I could go on about Ned Vizzini, and especially how encouraging he was of his friends and how genuinely in awe he was of other writers. Everyone he'd ever worked with or known well, he praised at length as though he simply couldn't fathom how creatively that person's mind worked. Every time, I just wanted to say, "Ned, you're a better storyteller than all of them. You know that, right?"

    The other day, I walked past the Tam O'Shanter, and I noticed that this restaurant, which has been around since 1922, had replaced its slightly dorky sign with a brand-new crest that was scribbled-looking and ostentatiously hip. I laughed and immediately made a mental note to tell Ned: How funny that a key part of this place where we so often met to discuss nostalgia had now become ephemera itself. I remembered that the last time we'd gone there, he had gotten on his bike at the end of the night to pedal home, promising me that he had another juicy story that he'd have to save for next time, since he had a young son to put to bed. As I thought of that yesterday, and wondered how somebody so selfless could commit such a selfish act, I searched his writings and his texts and his e-mails for answers. Then I found an interview Ned gave that reminded me of that final moment I saw him, a quote about something so vivid and yet earnestly described — so quintessentially Ned — that my heart leapt up in my throat. "My favorite distraction from suicidal thoughts is riding my bike," Ned said in the interview, adding, "Bad thoughts get caught under the front wheel and good ones whiz up the back into my brain.
    "