Tuesday, December 5, 2017

Hackers Compromised the Trump Organization 4 Years Ago—and the Company Never Noticed – Mother Jones

Hackers Compromised the Trump Organization 4 Years Ago—and the Company Never Noticed – Mother Jones

Hackers Compromised the Trump Organization 4 Years Ago—and the Company Never Noticed

The perpetrators have possible ties to Russia.

Nov. 1, 2017 9:01 PM

Looking for news you can trust?
Subscribe to our free newsletters.

Mother Jones illustration; Olivier Douliery/Abaca Press/Sipa/AP

Four years ago, the Trump Organization experienced a major cyber breach that could have allowed the perpetrator (or perpetrators) to mount malware attacks from the company's web domains and may have enabled the intruders to gain access to the company's computer network. Up until this week, this penetration had gone undetected by President Donald Trump's company, according to several internet security researchers.

In 2013, a hacker (or hackers) apparently obtained access to the Trump Organization's domain registration account and created at least 250 website subdomains that cybersecurity experts refer to as "shadow" subdomains. Each one of these shadow Trump subdomains pointed to a Russian IP address, meaning that they were hosted at these Russian addresses. (Every website domain is associated with one or more IP addresses. These addresses allow the internet to find the server that hosts the website. Authentic Trump Organization domains point to IP addresses that are hosted in the United States or countries where the company operates.) The creation of these shadow subdomains within the Trump Organization network was visible in the publicly available records of the company's domains.

Here is a list of a Trump Organization shadow subdomains.

The subdomains and their associated Russian IP addresses have repeatedly been linked to possible malware campaigns, having been flagged in well-known research databases as potentially associated with malware. The vast majority of the shadow subdomains remained active until this week, indicating that the Trump Organization had taken no steps to disable them. This suggests that the company for the past four years was unaware of the breach. Had the infiltration been caught by the Trump Organization, the firm should have immediately decommissioned the shadow subdomains, according to cybersecurity experts contacted by Mother Jones.

Two weeks ago, a computer security expert, who wishes to remain unidentified, contacted Mother Jones and provided the list of the shadow Trump Organization subdomains. He explained what he believed had happened. Some hacker—or group—had gained access to the Trump Organization's GoDaddy domain registration account. Like many companies, the Trump Organization has registered a long list of domain names, many of which it has never put to use. Some examples: BarronTrump.com, DonaldTrump.org, ChicagoTrumpTower.com, CelebrityPokerDealer.com, and DonaldTrumpPyramidScheme.com.

The existence of these shadow subdomains suggests a possible security compromise within Trump's business network that created the potential for unknown actors—using these Trump Organization subdomains—to launch attacks that could trick computer users anywhere into handing over sensitive information and unknowingly allow the attackers access to their computers and network. In fact, the IP addresses associated with the fake subdomains are linked to an IP address for at least one domain previously used by hackers to deploy malware known as an "exploit kit," which can allow an attacker to gain a computer user's passwords and logins or to take over another computer and gain access to the files within it.

For each of more than a hundred of these Trump domains, the intruder created two shadow subdomains, with the names of these subdomains generally following a pattern: three to seven seemingly random letters placed before the real domain name. Here are examples from the list: bfdh.BarronTrump.com and dhfb.BarronTrump.com; bfch.DonaldTrump.org and bxdc.DonaldTrump.org; cesf.ChicagoTrumpTower.com and vsrv.ChicagoTrumpTower.com; dxgrg.CelebrityPokerDealer.com and vsrfg.CelebrityPokerDealer.com; and bdth.DonaldTrumpPyramidscheme.com and drhg.DonaldTrumpPyramidScheme.com.

The available historical data for these shadow subdomains indicate most of them were created in August 2013. When they first were set up, the shadow subdomains were aimed at one of 17 IP addresses on a network that was based in St. Petersburg, Russia, and they were hosted on servers owned by a company called the Petersburg Internet Network, a server provider with a reputation for hosting nefarious actors. 

In a January 2015 blog post about fraudulent IP routing and malware, Doug Madory, the director of internet analysis at Dyn, called the Petersburg Internet Network "perhaps the leading contender for being named the Mos Eisley of the Internet," a reference to the wild and seedy spaceport city on the planet Tatooine in the Star Wars movies. Currently, the IP addresses for these shadow Trump subdomains are registered to a different entity in Russia. According to several cybersecurity experts, the fact that the IP addresses point to Russia does not mean the Trump Organization breach originated there. 

The shadow Trump Organization subdomains point to IP addresses in the range between 46.161.27.184 and 46.161.27.200—and these addresses are part of a larger network. In October 2013, a security researcher identified a website called BewareCommaDelimited.org deploying an exploit kit that was intended to pilfer passwords and other information from targeted computers and noted it was associated with this IP address: 46.161.27.176. That IP address is within the same network as the IP addresses used for the shadow Trump Organization subdomains—an indication that these subdomains might have been part of a network used to deploy malware against other computers. 

This week, a researcher named C. Shawn Eib wrote a blog post highlighting the existence of the shadow subdomains, which had been referenced in a Twitter thread several weeks ago. Eib noted that "more than 250 subdomains of domains registered to the Trump Organization redirect traffic to computers in St. Petersburg, Russia."

Another computer security expert, who also asked not to be named, notes that this network of shadow subdomains may have been established by a criminal enterprise looking to use the Trump Organization's computer system as the launching pad for various cyberattacks on other individuals or entities. But, he adds, this breach also could be exploited by state or nonstate actors attempting to infiltrate the Trump Organization. "At the least," he remarks, "it shows the Trump Organization has been badly run."

In his blog post, Eib notes, "With an organization of this size, and with the added security concerns and scrutiny that a presidential campaign and victory would entail, it would be inexcusable for this to not have been discovered by their IT department. Any basic security audit would show the existence of these subdomains, and what servers they're leading to. This is sloppy at best, and potentially criminally negligent at worst, depending on the traffic that is being run through these servers."

All of the legitimate Trump Organization domains and the suspected subdomains were registered through GoDaddy. The creation of the shadow subdomains suggests that the hacker (or hackers) compromised the company's GoDaddy account and, depending on how the account was penetrated, the intruders could have obtained passwords and access to other computers in the Trump Organization network. 

The creation of these Trump Organization subdomains looks like a classic case of domain-shadowing, according to Steve Lord, a British cybersecurity expert at Raw Hex, a startup that trains people on micro-electronics and computer coding. He examined internet records and reviewed the matter for Mother Jones. Lord notes the Trump Organization shadow subdomains fit the pattern of a major case of domain-shadowing that in 2011 struck clients of GoDaddy, one of the largest domain registrars in the world.

In a March 2015 blog post, Nick Biasini, a threat researcher at Cisco's Talos Security Intelligence and Research Group, described how domain-shadowing works: 

These accounts are typically compromised through phishing. The threat actor then logs in with credentials and creates large amounts of subdomains. Since a lot of users have multiple domains this can provide a nearly endless supply of domains…This behavior has shown to be an effective way to avoid typical detection techniques like blacklisting of sites or IP addresses. 

In the post, Biasini noted that the practice of domain-shadowing goes back to 2011 and, like everything else in the tech world, has become more sophisticated over time. 

When cyber professionals notice suspected malware coming through their networks or in the wild, they often share this information with public malware databases so the broader information security community is aware and can analyze the potential malware. In the case of the Trump-related subdomains, many have been flagged as suspected malware carriers by IT professionals and security researchers who then uploaded references to these subdomains to VirusTotal, a malware research database.  

VirusTotal lists the findings of cybersecurity firms that analyze URLs suspected of being associated with malware. For many but not all of the Trump-related subdomains, according to the VirusTotal listings, Kaspersky, the Russian antivirus company, detected a possible association with malware. (Kaspersky is in the news now due to allegations that it has worked with the Russian government to steal data from US government computers, a claim the company denies. Many security researchers, though, agree that the company is highly skilled at identifying Russian malware.)

"It's telling that Kaspersky detected [this malware], while others didn't," Lord tells Mother Jones. That could be a measure of the malware's sophistication. 

The cybersecurity expert who shared the list with Mother Jones says he could find no legitimate use for the subdomains. He notes that the full scope of the attackers' breach of the Trump Organization domains remains unclear, but he adds that the hackers who have launched attacks from this block of IP addresses have the ability to wage highly sophisticated cyber assaults. "I'd have to imagine that the file and mail servers on the Trump Org network would be the world's largest repository of information that could be used to gain leverage over our president," he remarks. He also points out that this breach signals the Trump Organization did not employ secure IT: "The big thing is that they didn't notice." 

In response to request for comment, the Trump Organization sent this statement:

There has been no "hack" within the Trump Organization and the domain names [in question] do not host active websites and do not have any content. Publishing anything to the contrary would be highly irresponsible. Moreover, we have no association with the "shadow domains" you reference…and are looking into your inquiry with our third party domain registrar. There is no malware detected on any of these domains and our security team takes any and all threats very seriously.

The security expert who first shared the list of subdomains with Mother Jones notes that it is true that shadow subdomains "do not currently host active websites and that there is no reason to believe that there is currently any malware active on these domains." But, he remarks, the Trump Organization's registrar account "was likely compromised since someone created these hundreds of records and if it wasn't an authorized Trump Org person, that only leaves unauthorized persons."

Shown the Trump Organization's statement, Lord replied, 

There's two possible situations as I see it. Either they set up their own domain records to point at servers hosted in St. Petersburg, Russia…or someone else did. In either case, the question is why. For an organization on the cusp of a number of investigations about suspicious links to Russia, I'd hoped they would've given more public thought to the possibility that their domain ownership was at some point hijacked possibly through no fault of their own before denying everything.

The Trump Organization did not respond to follow-up questions. 

The security expert who first alerted Mother Jones to the Trump-related shadow subdomains noted that as soon as the Trump Organization responded for this story, records related to the subdomains began disappearing. 



^ed 

Thursday, November 30, 2017

Piers Morgan calls out Trump for Retweeting Fake anti-Muslim videos

Piers: Retweeting anti-Muslim videos is worst Trump thing

Piers Morgan even called Trump ss Racist today. And INFOWARS called him out as well as Paul Joseph Watson. 







When other White Supremacists call you out for inciting violence using fake videos that demonize Muslims, you just might be a Racist. 


Trump's behavior has been increasingly erratic and delusional the past three days. People are calling from inside the Whitehouse saying they are genuinely concerned that he is a danger to to himself and others. 



Looks like they are getting ready to 5150 him at a Psych Ward. That can't happen soon enough. 




Yours, 


@ChilliePenguin



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5129041/amp/PIERS-Retweeting-anti-Muslim-videos-WORST-Trump-thing.html

PIERS MORGAN: Endorsing a bunch of Muslim-hating fascists is the very WORST thing Trump has done as President and, unless he apologizes, makes him a racist and Islamophobe too

 President Donald Trump today publicly endorsed disgusting, far-right Islamophobia and racism.

There is simply no other conclusion to be drawn from his decision to retweet three posts by Jayda Fransen, deputy leader of Britain First – an anti-Islam, anti-immigration, fascist organisation.

Each of the tweets contains deeply inflammatory material, specifically designed to whip up hatred towards Muslims.

The first is captioned: 'VIDEO: Muslim migrant beats up Dutch boy on crutches'.

The second is captioned: 'VIDEO: Muslim Destroys a Statue of Virgin Mary!'

The third is captioned: 'VIDEO, Islamist mob pushes teenage boy off roof and beats him to death!'

The first video President Trump posted depicted 'Muslim migrant' according to Jayda Fransen, beating up a 'Dutch boy on crutches' 
The second video shows a 'Muslim man' speaking to the camera and then bashing a statue of Virgin Mary on the ground, shattering her 
The third video President Trump retweeted shows an 'Islamist mob pushes teenage boy off roof and beats him to death!' 

None of these videos has been independently verified.

All of them might be faked, spliced, photo-shopped – who the hell knows? Stuff like this flies around the internet all day every day and much of it cannot be trusted.

The content is particularly untrustworthy when posted by someone like Jayda Fransen, who is a truly vile piece of work.

A year ago, Fransen, 30, was convicted of religiously aggravated harassment after she hurled abuse at a Muslim woman wearing a hijab.

She was fined around $2500 for screaming abuse at Sumayyah Sharpe during a 'Christian patrol' of a park in Luton, a town just north of London.

Fransen admitted telling her victim that Muslim men 'cannot control their sexual urges' adding 'that's why they are coming into my country raping women across the continent.'

Ms Sharpe was with her four young children at the time.

Judge Carolyn Mellanby said in her verdict on Fransen: 'I have no doubt the words used towards her (Ms Sharpe) represented everything against her and what she believes in. In other words, offensive, insulting, abusive, and in my judgement intended to cause offence and alarm and distress to her religion.'

Fransen and Britain First leader Paul Golding have also both been separately charged with racially and religiously aggravated intentional harassment following a police investigation into the distribution of hateful leaflets and online videos.

And just last week, Fransen was charged with using 'threatening, abusive and insulting words or behavior' during a speech she made at an event in Belfast, Northern Ireland.

The videos were posted by Jayda Fransen, the deputy leader of Britain First (pictured)

So we are talking about very nasty, very dangerous people.

Last year, during the very polarized EU Referendum campaign, an extreme right-wing terrorist named Thomas Mair shouted 'Britain first!' before shooting dead Jo Cox, a young female member of parliament.

There was no suggestion that Mair was involved with or influenced by the organization. 

Now that group has, astonishingly, just been given the presidential seal of approval.

Fransen, naturally, was so thrilled when she saw Trump's retweets, she instantly responded in hysterically happy capital letters:

'THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, DONALD TRUMP, HAS RETWEETED THREE OF DEPUTY LEADER JAYDA FRANSEN'S TWITTER VIDEOS! DONALD TRUMP HIMSELF HAS RETWEETED THESE VIDEOS AND HAS AROUND 44 MILLION FOLLOWERS! GOD BLESS YOU TRUMP! GOD BLESS AMERICA!'

These words, and the breathless excitement that accompanied them, made me want to physically puke.

Within minutes, Fransen's Twitter follower count began rocketing.

That, as I know from personal experience, is what happens when Trump retweets you; it makes you more popular.

So she now has thousands more people to contaminate with her despicable bigotry.

Trump's retweets sparked immediate outrage and criticism from all quarters, even from some media entities normally sympathetic to him, like Infowars, which is run by preposterous conspiracy theorist Alex Jones,

'Yeah,' tweeted its editor-at-large Paul Joseph Watson, 'someone may want to tell whoever is running Trump's Twitter account this morning that retweeting Britain First is not great optics.'

Not great optics?

They're absolutely appalling optics.

I don't know what on earth possessed Donald Trump to offer such a stunning, shocking and repulsive endorsement of these racist Muslim-despising scumbags.

Either he had no idea who these people really are, or he did know and decided they were worthy of his support.

The first makes him a bloody fool.

The second makes him a bloody disgrace.

I don't know what on earth possessed Donald Trump to offer such a stunning, shocking and repulsive endorsement of these racist scumbags. He's either a fool or a bloody disgrace

Whatever the truth, the massive damage has now been done.

The President of the United States has officially endorsed the extreme far-right in a way he has never done so transparently before.

By doing so, he has also endorsed a blind, pathological hatred of all Muslims.

Mr President, please do not underestimate the enormity of what you did today.

You're the most powerful person on earth, and your words carry huge weight, as do your retweets.

You have now effectively told all the world's bigots, racists, Islamophobes and white supremacists that you're with them, that they're YOUR kind of people.

Just read and watch their joyful reaction all over social media.

They can't believe their luck, and I can't believe what you've done.

Casually tossing videos like this out to tens of millions of people, purely to encourage hatred of Muslims, is almost beyond belief.

You might as well have addressed the American people from the Oval Office with a Ku Klux Klan hat on.

As Brendan Cox, husband of murdered Jo Cox, said: 'Spreading hatred has consequences and the President should be ashamed of himself.'

I'll go further: this isn't just shameful, Mr Trump, this is the worst thing you have done as President.

I urge you to immediately undo those three re-tweets, and apologize unreservedly.

That won't repair the terrible damage you've done.

But it will at least acknowledge that you understand just how wrong it was.

If you don't, we will be left to assume that you too are a hateful Islamophobe and racist.

Are you, Mr President?



^ed 

DailyDDose: Translating Trump Epic Meltdown, November 30, 2017

In other words, the situation will be handled, but I'm not the one who will be taking care of it. 


Thanks. Fucking. God. 


Trump is an incompetent dotard, and the only thing that would come of Trump's intervention would be Nuclear War with North Korea.   



In other words, the situation will be handled, but I'm not the one who will be taking care of it. 


Thanks. Fucking. God. Trump is an incompetent, delusional and dangerous man. The only thing that would come of a Trump inspired intervention would be World War III. 





Trump is alienating our closest allies just as we need them most as he continues to provoke Kim Jong Un. And no Theresa May, Prime Minister is the UK. 







 And that's the DailyDDoSe November 30, 2017

Elyssa Durant
Policy and Research Analyst
Columbia University, NY

Wednesday, November 29, 2017

Donald Trump retweets Britain First deputy leader's Islamophobic posts - opinion

Donald Trump retweets Britain First deputy leader's Islamophobic posts

This woman's timeline is toxic and sickening. ALL of it is targeted harassment against people of Muslim faith. 


If you can't tell by now that Donald Trump is a raging White Supremacist then you are lack basic critical thinking skills. 




I wonder if they will hold another Nazi Rally to protect this statue. 



http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-britain-first-retweet-muslim-migrants-jayda-fransen-deputy-leader-a8082001.html?amp

Donald Trump retweets Britain First deputy leader's Islamophobic posts

Donald Trump has shared a series of anti-Muslim tweets from far-right extremist group Britain First, sparking condemnation for spreading its "deplorable" ideology to a global audience.

The first video, originally shared by deputy leader Jayda Fransen's account, claimed to show "Muslim migrants beating up a Dutch boy on crutches".

A second re-post was captioned "Muslim destroys statue of Virgin Mary", while a third read "Islamist mob pushes teenage boy off roof and beats him to death".

The content of the videos or their origin could not be independently verified.

Shortly afterwards, the President called on Americans to "boycott Fake News CNN" and hailed "another great day for the stock market".

Mr Trump has been taking frequent aim at critical media outlets in recent days, as well as the Hillary Clinton email scandal and attacking Democrats who oppose his policies.

Donald Trump shared three tweets from Britain First deputy leader Jayda Fransen's account

His early-morning Twitter frenzy came days after Ms Fransen was arrested over a speech made at a rally in Belfast - the latest in a series of incidents over alleged hate speech, religious harrassment and incitement by Britain First members.

Ms Fransen's account celebrated the shares, claiming that Mr Trump "himself" had retweeted the videos to almost 44 million followers around the world.

"God bless you Trump! God bless America!" read a tweet, signed off with the abbreviation OCS, meaning Onward Christian Soldiers.

The account, which is partly automated, frequently shares unverified videos claiming to show migrants and Muslims physically or verbally attacking people in Europe.

She is the deputy leader of Britain First, which styles itself a political party but has been condemned by campaigners as a far-right extremist group.

Donald Trump's least presidential moments so far...

It calls on supporters to join the "British resistance" and "secure a future for British children" and has become known for paramilitary-style "invasions" targeting mosques.

The past year has seen the group's leaders travel to meet far-right groups in Poland and other countries, amid warnings that extremists are increasing international coordination to recruit vulnerable people online.

Brendan Cox, the husband of murdered MP Jo Cox, said Mr Trump had "legitimised the far-right in his own country, now he's trying to do it in ours".

"Spreading hatred has consequences and the President should be ashamed of himself," he added.

Ms Cox was murdered by a far-right extremist who repeatedly shouted "Britain first" during his brutal attack, although it was unclear whether he was referring to the group and he was also supported by the neo-Nazi terrorist group National Action.

Nick Ryan, of Hope Not Hate, told The Independent it was "pretty incredulous that the leader of the free world would stoop to sharing content from one of the most notorious far-right groups in the UK, which has had links to the past to Loyalists, the British National Party".

Unite Against Fascism's joint secretary, Weyman Bennett, said Mr Trump must be condemned for the "deplorable" shares.

"It beggars belief that the most powerful person in the world is retweeting Ms Fransen's vile views," he added.

"Britain First rubbed shoulders with fascists in the large far-right demonstration in Warsaw, just weeks ago. They are a poisonous organisation."

A more unlikely critic was Infowars conspiracy theorist Paul Joseph Watson, who said that "retweeting Britain First is not great optics".



^ed 

Trump Paid Over $1 Million in Labor Settlement, Documents Reveal - THIS IS HUGE!

Trump Paid Over $1 Million in Labor Settlement, Documents Reveal - The New York Times

THIS IS HUGE!!!! Trump hired illegals and paid a hefty fine. He also hired 73 immigrants to work at Mar-A-Lago because Trump doesn't pay a fair wage and they don't even get healthcare or other benefits. 



This is HUGE!! 



https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/11/27/nyregion/trump-tower-illegal-immigrant-workers-union-settlement.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur&referer=

Trump Paid Over $1 Million in Labor Settlement, Documents Reveal

The Bonwit Teller building in 1980, as it was being demolished to make way for the new Trump Tower.Associated Press

In 1980, under pressure to begin construction on what would become his signature project, Donald J. Trump employed a crew of 200 undocumented Polish workers who worked in 12-hour shifts, without gloves, hard hats or masks, to demolish the Bonwit Teller building on Fifth Avenue, where the 58-story, golden-hued Trump Tower now stands.

The workers were paid as little as $4 an hour for their dangerous labor, less than half the union wage, if they got paid at all.

More in New York



^ed 

Is Trump Agitating North Korea Just to Pass a Military Budget?

This seems like more than a coincidence to me. It is worth noting that Trump is pushing for a huge military budget right now at the cost of domestic social welfare programs and education.

Is Kim Jong Un Working with Trump?

This looks like an awful big coincidence. We know that major news is about to break regarding Flynn flipping on Trump. 


Many think North Korea is working WITH Trump to create distractions from the Russian scandal. Your thoughts? 




^ed 

Tuesday, November 28, 2017

The Death of the American White Evangelical by Chris McCoy

The Death of the American White Evangelical

How Bad Theology Produced Bad Politics and Killed a Movement

 

In the early morning hours of October 18, 2015, black musician Corey Jones was driving home after performing drums with his band.  A car malfunction forced him to pull over on I-95 in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and as he attended to the vehicle, a plainclothes police officer, Nouman Raja, approached Coreyafter arriving to the scene in an unmarked van.  Frightened by Raja and not recognizing him as law enforcement, Corey exposed a registered gun but did not fire.  Raja then drew his weapon and unloaded multiple shots that fatally wounded Corey.  Just a few hours later, Corey was scheduled to play drums for Sunday morning services at his church.  

Once again, it seemed the police state had murdered a person of color.  The killing enraged the local black community, who quickly organized a rally to demand justice.  I attended the rally to show support, and as a white man who was raised in the evangelical tradition, what I witnessed simply floored me.  Local leaders took the stage and guided the community in prayer, pleading with God for a justice grounded in the Christian scriptures.  Worship leaders directed the community in singingChristian hymns and praise songs, such as "How Great is Our God," and the chorus of voices rivaled any cathedral choir.  Pastors opened their bibles and preached sermons, one even preaching racial equality from the Letter to the Romans, a book that I as an evangelical had grown accustomed to as the "how to get out of hell" handbook.  For this black community in Palm Beach Gardens, faith meant not only personal, private contact with God, but it also meant public and political justice.  In their God's name, they would not let this injustice stand.  

Just over one year later, eighty-one percent of American white evangelicals, in their God's name, elected a known racist, sexist, ableist, adulterer and lover of money to the presidency.  On November 8, 2016, the white evangelical died, pulling the plug on the precarious life support system that hardly could sustain them.  The white evangelical support of Donald Trump exposed the movement's true colors, one that many of us already knew, and the white narrative that had dominated American Christianity came crumbling down like the walls of Jericho.  While political and social commentators rushed to explain the white evangelical vote, the results of that November night did not surprise me.  America had this coming, and the white evangelical, as one who had succumbed to the peer pressure of the Republican party, toed the party line.  Politically speaking, one could trace this step most recently back to the 1980s, when Jerry Falwell Sr.'s Moral Majority movement led the white evangelical to the Republicans.  But theologically speaking something was happening too: the white evangelical practiced a theology that almost exclusively focused on individual salvation and morality, in contrast to the practice of early Christianity, and this individualistic focus practically ignored the larger social justice issues in America.  Thus, the white evangelical could vote for Donald Trump, because, one, he was a Republican, and two, the social injustices that Trump perpetuated simply did not matter.  The death of the white evangelical, as a result, potentially signaled a new era of American Christianity.  The demise paved the way for a fresh discourse that elevates the voice of the marginalized while it seeks justice, as Corey's community exemplified, thus re-connecting American Christianity with its first century roots.  

Social justice held much greater importance with the early Christian church than it does with the white evangelical.   The New Testament writers and their communities understood that a gulf existed between God and humanity due to sin entering the world in the Garden of Eden. Sin was a power that caused all the world's ills, ranging from individual immoral behavior to the structural oppressive systems of nations.  The ancient Christians continued the Jewish belief that God had appointed the nation ofIsrael to be a "light" to humanity, and through both individual and corporate just behavior, Israel would lead humanity back to God, and so reversing the curse of sin.  By the time of Jesus, Israel had suffered an exile and was now a subject of Roman rule, and it appeared that the role of Israel as the world's pathway to God had gone defunct.  As one who understood himself as a divinely appointed figure in Israel's history, in fact a climatic figure, Jesus believed God had not forsaken the promises that God made to Israel and humanity.   Like the Hebrew prophets of old, Jesus believed God would one dayrestore Israel and humanity to God, "righting the world's wrongs," as New Testament scholar Tom Wright phrases it.  But Jesus also believed that this restorative process had begun in his own day.  When Jesus began his public ministry, he attended synagogue services in Nazareth, his hometown.  He read from the book of Isaiah, a Hebrew prophet, where Isaiah envisions a future when the economically distressed receive good news, criminal prisoners receive their liberty, the blind receive their sight, and God sets free those who are oppressed.  After he completed his reading, Jesus announced that God was fulfilling these promises that very day.  For Jesus, the restoration of human lives that sin had diminished was beginning in his own presence.  It was not only an individual restoration with God, but also the dismantling of systems that subjugated God's creatures.

Throughout his ministry, Jesus preached and performed acts of justice as a manifestation of God's kingdom, and by the kingdom of God he meant God's presence on earth, a presence that eliminated sin.  Jesus healed diseases, criticized the accumulation of wealth and economic disparity, taught peaceful reconciliation between humans, and associated with the socialpariahs, among many other acts and words of social justice.  For Jesus, these deeds and expressions were not random acts of kindness, but rather a turning a point in history, that moment when God removed sin that separated humanity from God and each other.  However, Jesus' words and deeds had an edge to them; they were a counter-cultural critique.  As a Jew living under the oppressive Roman hand in Palestine, Jesus was quite aware of the imperial values of Rome. Whereas Rome worshiped emperors, money, power and violence, and so marginalizing those who they ruled, the kingdom that Jesus preached promoted economic and racial equality, peace, and the elevation of the marginalized. The edgy counter-cultural message of Jesus ultimately led to his torture and crucifixion, and according to Christian belief, God raised Jesus from the dead three days later as a sign of vindication.

The first century followers of Jesus wrestled with the significance of Jesus' ministry, death, and resurrection.  The most prolific writer of the New Testament, the Apostle Paul, particularly tackled these questions.  For Paul, yes, a major component of God's restoration project was removing the sin that separated an individual from God.  But Paul also understood that something bigger, even cosmic was at play, and this was the result of Jesus' death and resurrection.  In his Letter to the Romans, Paul states that the entire creation has been groaning as it lives under sin, but God is in the process of liberating the entire creation.  The cross that had killed Jesus was also a tool to restore everything to God, according to Paul, because it removed the sin that had separated all of God's creation from God.  Elsewhere Paul, or at least someone writing in Paul's name, explains that Jesus' death on the cross "disarmed the powers and authorities" and had made a spectacle of them by "triumphing over them by the cross" (Colossians 2:25).  In other words, the systemic powers of the state and society, which typically oppress, had lost their stranglehold over humanity due to Jesus' death on the cross.  Because the cross dealt with sin, oppressive powers that were the result of sin could no longer oppress God's children.

Like Jesus, the early church faced a tension between living under Roman rule and living out God's alternative kingdom.  The early church did not endorse a dominion theology, or a theology that sought a total Christian takeover of government and culture.  Rather, the early church understood that they were to live counter-culturally; they were to provide an alternative way of being.  This included not only living individual, moral lives, but it also included prioritizing public justice, exactly as Jesus had done.  The result was that the church faced persecution at various times in its formative history, including imprisonment and death, which continued at certain points fornearly three centuries under emperors such as Nero, Domitian, Diocletian and Decian.  The book of Revelation, in fact, was likely written by a late first century persecuted Christian community who employed metaphorical language to critique Roman oppression.  

When analyzing the theology of the modern white evangelical, a theology that enabled the election of Donald Trump, even a casual observer of Christian history can notice a significant disparity between the theology of ancient Christianity and white evangelical doctrine.  While it is true that every faith system changes over time, adapting to the circumstances, the white evangelical has taken the faith in a direction that I believe the founders of the faith could not fathom.  The white evangelical church has focused almost exclusively on individual salvation, or escaping hell to reach heaven, and concomitant with it, an emphasis on individual piety and well-being.  Yes, the early church cared greatly about individual salvation as well as the moral behavior of the individual.  But unlike the white evangelical, they understood salvation holistically, which had implications for justice at every level of society.  

A series of complex reasons throughout history can probably explain the gap between early Christianity and the white evangelical, such as Martin Luther's focus on individual salvation as a hallmark of the Protestant Reformation (he really did not have a choice at the time); the rise of dispensational theology in the 19th century, which envisioned social justice as a future, not present reality; the evangelical reaction to critical biblical scholarship; the evangelical overcompensation the "social gospel's" near exclusive emphasis on social justice, and so on.  But whatever the reasons for the white evangelical's narrow theological focus, the result is that they have become their biggest fear: irrelevant.  Where was the white evangelical when half of the nation was earning less than $30,000 a year, exhausted from working multiple jobs for low wages, barely able to afford rent and healthcare? Where was the white evangelical when the war on drugs targeted people of color and created a system of mass incarceration, decimating communities of color and formulating a "New Jim Crow" as law professor Michelle Alexander describes it? Where was the white evangelical when the United States invaded Iraq, an invasion based on fabricated intelligence, killing 500,000 Iraqis in the process? Where was the white evangelical when the majority ofscientists warned us of catastrophic climate change? They were busy, instead, building mega-churches, focusing on "church growth," and preaching sermons on how to connect with God individually.  The white evangelical blunted early Christianity's counter-cultural edge, and they succumbed to the white bourgeois culture that defined America's elites.  Rather than "speaking truth to power" to Caesar, the white evangelical looked like Caesar himself.

The irrelevance of the white evangelical is obvious, as Generation X has left the movement, and the Millennial Generation refuses to identify with it.  As America lowers the coffin of the white evangelical into the ground, perhaps now in its place can arise the voice of the marginalized.   It is the marginalized – people of color, women, the LGBTQ community, immigrants, and the poor – who can truly grasp the counter-cultural edge of Christianity, for they are the ones who suffer at the hands of systemic powers and can better appreciate the holistic nature of salvation.  This does not mean there is not a place for white people in the future of American Christianity. In fact, we are witnessing positive movements of white Christians emerging in the United States, such as the Red Letter Christians, who are attempting to re-join orthodox theology with social justice. But perhaps the role of white American Christians should now be one as an ally rather than a leader.  We had our time, and we blew it.

The black community that mourned Corey Jones' death did notlet the killing ruin them, but instead through the foundation of their Christian faith, they fought for not just justice, but justice in the name of Jesus.  Because of the community's efforts, the state is charging Officer Raja with manslaughter and attempted murder, which could set a national precedent in racial police brutality cases if he receives a conviction.  That right there is first century, counter-cultural Christianity before our eyes; it is a type of Christianity that the white evangelical refused to embrace.  The contrast between the two communities, one that seeks justice, and one that perpetuates injustice, proves that the death of the white evangelical is real and necessary.  Jesus said that in the kingdom of God "the first will be last, and the last will be first."  Instead of denying the white evangelical's death, it is time for those who of us who are first to surrender to those whom we have made last. 

 

 

 

--
Elyssa Durant, Ed.M.
Nashville, Tennessee



"You may not care how much I know, but you don't know how much I care."



______________________________