Tavistock Institutions in The United States

by Dr. John Coleman

from Conspirators’ Hierarchy - The Story of the Committee of 300

 

• FLOW LABORATORIES

  Gets contracts from the National Institute of Health.

   

   

• MERLE THOMAS CORPORATION

  Gets contracts from the U.S. Navy, analyzes data from satellites.

   

   

• WALDEN RESEARCH

  Does work in the field of pollution control.

   

   

• PLANNING RESEARCH CORPORATION, ARTHUR D. LITTLE, G.E. “TEMPO,” OPERATIONS RESEARCH INC.
   

  Part of approximately 350 firms who conduct research and conduct surveys, make recommendations to government. They are part of what President Eisenhower called “a possible danger to public policy that could itself become captive of a scientific-technological elite.”

   

   

• // Open to size // var newWin1=null; function getPage(thePage,wt,ht) { leftPos= 0; topPos = 0; if ( newWin1 && !newWin1.closed ) { newWin1.close(); } newWin1 = window.open(thePage,'aWin','toolbars=no, resizeable=no,scrollbars=yes,left='+leftPos+',top='+topPos+',width='+wt+',height='+ht); } BROOKINGS INSTITUTION

   

  Dedicates its work to what it calls a “national agenda.” Wrote President Hoover’s program, President Roosevelt’s “New Deal,” the Kennedy Administration’s “New Frontiers” program (deviation from it cost John F. Kennedy his life), and President Johnson’s “Great Society.” Brookings has been telling the United States Government how to conduct its affairs for the past 70 years and is still doing so on behalf of the Committee of 300.

   

   

• HUDSON INSTITUTE

  
  Under the direction of Herman Khan, this institution has done more to shape the way Americans react to political and social events, think, vote and generally conduct themselves than perhaps any except the BIG FIVE. Hudson specializes in defense policy research and relations with the USSR. Most of its military work is classified as SECRET. (One idea during the Vietnam War was to build a moat around Saigon.) Some of its earlier papers were entitled “Stability and Tranquility Among Older Nations,” and “Analytical Summary of U.S. National Security Policy Issues.”

  
  Hudson prides itself on its diversity; it helped NASA with its space programs and helped to promote new youth fashions and ideas, youth rebellion and alienation for the Committee of 300, ostensibly funded by Coca Cola. Hudson may be quite properly classified as one of the Committee of 300’s BRAIN-WASHING establishments. Some of its nuclear war scenarios make for very interesting reading and, if they can be obtained, I would recommend “The 6 Basic Thermonuclear Threats” and “Possible Outcomes of Thermonuclear War” and one of its more frightening papers entitled “Israeli-Arab Nuclear War.”

  
  Hudson also does corporate advising for Committee of 300 companies, Rank, Xerox, General Electric, IBM and General Motors, to name but a few of them, but its really big client remains the U. S. Department of Defense which includes matters of civil defense, national security, military policy and arms control. To date it has not got into “wet NASA,” that is to say, the National Oceanographic Agency.

   

   

• NATIONAL TRAINING LABORATORIES

  
  NTL is also known as the International Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences. This institute is definitely a brainwashing center based on Kurt Lewin principles which include so-called T-Groups (training groups), artificial stress training whereby participants suddenly find themselves immersed in defending themselves against vicious accusations. NTL takes in the National Education Association, the largest teacher-group in the United States.

  
  While officially decrying “racism,” it is interesting to note that NTL, working with NEA, produced a paper proposing education vouchers which would separate the hard-to-teach children from the brighter ones, and funding would be allocated according to the number of difficult children who would be separated from those who progressed at a normal rate. The proposal was not taken up.

   

   

• UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, WHARTON - SCHOOL OF FINANCE & COMMERCE

  
  Founded by Eric Trist, one of the “brain trusts” of Tavistock, Wharton has become one of the more important Tavistock institutions in the U.S. in so far as “Behavioral Research” is concerned. Wharton attracts clients such as the U.S. Department of Labor—which it teaches how to produce “cooked” statistics at the Wharton Econometric Forecasting Associates Incorporated. This method is very much in demand as we come to the close of 1991 with millions more out of work than is reflected in USDL statistics.

  
  Wharton’s ECONOMETRIC MODELING is used by every major Committee of 300 company in the United States, Western Europe and by the International Monetary Fund, the United Nations and the World Bank. Wharton has produced such note-worthy persons as George Schultz and Alan Greenspan.

   

   

• INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH

  
  This is the institute set up by “brain trusters” from Tavistock Rensis Likert, Dorwin Cartwright and Ronald Lippert. Among its studies are:

  • “The Human Meaning of Social Change”

  • “Youth in Transition”

  • “How Americans View Their Mental Health”

  Among the institute’s clients are

  • The Ford Foundation

  • U.S. Department of Defense

  • U.S. Postal Service and the U.S.Department of Justice

   

• INSTITUTE FOR THE FUTURE

  
  This is not a typical Tavistock institution in that it is funded by the Ford Foundation, yet it draws its long-range forecasting methodology from the mother of all think tanks. Institute for the Future projects what it believes to be changes that will be taking place in time frames of fifty years. The institute is supposed to be able to forecast socioeconomic trends and to blow the whistle on any departures from what it has laid down as normal.

  
  Institute for the Future believes it is possible and normal to intervene now and give decisions for the future. So-called “Delphi Panels” decide what is normal and what is not, and prepare position papers to “steer” government in the right direction to head off such groups as “people creating civil disorder.”

   

  (This could be patriotic groups demanding abolition of graduated taxes, or demanding that their right to bear arms is not infringed.)

  
  The institute recommends actions such as liberalizing abortion laws, drug usage and that cars entering an urban area pay tolls, teaching birth control in public schools, requiring registration of firearms, making the use of drugs a non-criminal offense, legalizing homosexuality, paying students for scholastic achievements, making zoning controls a preserve of the state, offering bonuses for family planning and last, but by no means least, a Pol Pot Cambodia-style proposal that new communities be established in rural areas. As will be observed, many of the Institute for the Future’s goals have already been more than fully realized.

   

   

• INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES (IPS)

  
  One of the “Big Three,” IPS has shaped and reshaped United States policies, foreign and domestic, since it was founded by James P. Warburg and the Rothschild entities in the United States, bolstered by Bertrand Russell and the British Socialists through its networks in America which include the League for Industrial democracy in which Leonard Woodcock played a leading, if behind-the-scenes role. Local lead players in the League for Industrial Democracy included “conservative” Jeane Kirkpatrick, Irwin Suall (of the ADL), Eugene Rostow (Arms Control negotiator), Lane Kirkland (Labor leader), and Albert Shanker.

  
  For record purposes only, IPS was incorporated in 1963 by Marcus Raskin and Richard Barnett, both highly-trained Tavistock Institute graduates. Most of the funding came from Rothschild associates in America like the James Warburg Family, the Stern Family Foundation and the Samuel Rubin Foundation. Samuel Rubin was a registered member of the Communist Party who stole the Faberge name (Faberge was “Jeweler of the Imperial Russian Court”) and made a fortune out of the Faberge name.

  
  The objectives of IPS came from an agenda laid down for it by the British Round Table, which agenda in turn came from Travistock Institute, one of the most notable being to create the “New Left” as a grass roots movement in the U.S. IPS was to engender strife and unrest and spread chaos like a wildfire out of control, proliferate the “ideals” of left wing nihilistic socialism, support unrestricted use of drugs of all types, and be the “big stick” with which to beat the United States political establishment.

  
  Barnett and Raskin controlled such diverse elements as,

  • the Black Panthers

  • Daniel Ellsberg

  • National Security Council staff member Halperin

  • The Weathermen Underground

  • the Venceramos

  • the campaign staff of candidate George McGovern

  No scheme was too big for IPS and its controllers to take on and manage.

  
  Take the plot to “kidnap” Kissinger, which was in the hands of Eqbal Ahmed, a British MI-6 intelligence agent of Pakistani origin, laundered through “TROTS” (Trotskyite terrorists based in London). The “plot” was “discovered” by the FBI so that it could not go too far. Ahmed went on to become the director of one of IPS’s most influential agencies, The Transnational Institute which, chameleon-like, changed from its former name, Institute of Race Relations, when intelligence agents of BOSS (Bureau of State Security) in South Africa unmasked the fact that it was tied directly to Rhodes Scholarship-Harry Oppenheimer and Anglo-American-British mining interests in South Africa. BOSS also discredited the South Africa Foundation at the same time.

  
  Through its many powerful lobbying groups on Capitol Hill, IPS relentlessly used its “big stick” to beat Congress. IPS has a network of lobbyists, all supposedly operating independently but in actual fact acting cohesively, so that Congressmen are pummeled from all sides by seemingly different and varied lobbyists. In this way, IPS was, and is still, able to successfully sway individual Representatives and Senators to vote for “the trend, the way things are going.” By using key point men on Capitol Hill, IPS was able to break into the very infrastructure of our legislative system and the way it works.

  
  To give only a single concrete example of what I am talking about: in 1975, an IPS point man persuaded representative John Conyers (D-Michigan) and forty-seven members of the House to request IPS to prepare a budget study that would oppose the budget being prepared by President Gerald Ford. Although not adopted, the request was reinstated in 1976, 1977, and 1978 gathering sponsors as it went.

  
  Then in 1978, fifty-six Congressmen signed their names to sponsor an IPS budget study. This was prepared by Marcus Raskin. Raskin’s budget called for a fifty percent cut in the Defense Budget, a socialist housing program “that would compete with and steadily replace private housing and mortgage markets,” a national health service, “radical changes in the educational system that would disrupt capitalist control over the distribution of knowledge,” and several other radical ideas.

  
  The influence of IPS on Arms Control negotiations was a major factor in getting Nixon to sign the treasonous ABM Treaty in 1972, which left the United States virtually defenseless against ICBM attack for almost 10 years. IPS became, and remains to this day one of the most prestigious “think tanks” controlling foreign policy decisions, which we, the people, foolishly believe are those of our law makers.

  
  By sponsoring militant activism at home and with links to revolutionaries abroad, by engineering such victories as “The Pentagon Papers,” besieging the corporate structure, bridging the credibility gap between underground movements and acceptable political activism, by penetrating religious organizations and using them to sow discord in America, such as radical racial politics under the guise of religion, using the establishment media to spread IPS ideas, and then supporting them, IPS has lived up to the role which it was founded to play.

   

   

• STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE

  
  Jesse Hobson, the first president of Stanford Research Institute, in a 1952 speech made it clear what lines the institute was to follow.

   

  Stanford can be described as one of the “jewels” in Tavistock’s Crown in its rule over the United States. Founded in 1946 immediately after the close of WW II, it was presided over by Charles A. Anderson, with emphasis on mind control re-search and “future sciences.” Included under the Stanford umbrella was Charles F. Kettering Foundation which developed the “Changing Images of Man” upon which the Aquarian Conspiracy rests.

  
  Some of Stanford’s major clients and contracts were at first centered around the defense establishment but, as Stanford grew, so did the diversity of its services:

  • Applications of Behavioral Sciences to Research

  • Management

  • Office of Science and Technology

  • SRI Business Intelligence Program

  • U.S. Department of Defense Directorate of Defense

  • Research and Engineering

  • U.S. Department of Defense Office of Aerospace Research

  Among corporations seeking Stanford’s services were

  • Wells Fargo Bank

  • Bechtel Corporation

  • Hewlett Packard

  • Bank of America

  • McDonnell-Douglas Corporation

  • Blyth

  • Eastman Dillon

  • TRW Company

  One of Stanford’s more secret projects was extensive work on chemical and bacteriological warfare (CAB) weapons.

  
  Stanford Research is plugged into at least 200 smaller “think tanks” doing research into every facet of life in America. This is known as ARPA networking and represents the emergence of probably the most far-reaching effort to control the environment of every individual in the country. At present Stanford’s computers are linked with 2500 “sister” research consoles which include the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Bell Telephone Laboratories, U.S. Army Intelligence, the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), RANI, MIT, Harvard and UCLA. Stanford plays a key role in that it is the “library,” cataloging all ARPA documentation.

  
  “Other agencies”—and one can use one’s imagination here, are allowed to search through SRI’s “library” for key words, phrases, look through sources and update their own master files with those of Stanford Research Center. The Pentagon, for instance, uses SRI’s “master files” extensively, and there is little doubt that other U.S. Government agencies do the same. Pentagon “command and control” problems are worked out by Stanford.

  
  While ostensibly these apply only to weapons and soldiers, there is absolutely no guarantee that the same research could not, and will not, be turned to civilian applications. Stanford is known to be willing to do anything for anyone, and it is my belief that if ever SRI were to be fully exposed, the hostility which would arise from revelations as to what it actually does would most probably force SRI to close.

   

   

• MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, ALFRED P. SLOAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

  
  This major institute is not generally recognized as being a part of Tavistock U.S.A. Most people look upon it as a purely American institution, but that is far from being the case. MIT-Alfred Sloan can be roughly divided into the following groups:

  • Contemporary Technology

  • Industrial Relations

  • Lewin Group Psychology

  • NASA-ERC Computer Research Laboratories

  • Office of Naval Research Group, Psychology

  • Systems Dynamics.

  Forrestor and Meadows wrote The Club of Rome’s “Limits of Growth” zero growth study.

   

  Some of MIT’s clients include the following:

  • American Management Association

  • American Red Cross

  • Committee for Economic Development

  • GTE

  • Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA)

  • NASA

  • National Academy of Sciences

  • National Council of Churches

  • Sylvania

  • TRW

  • U.S. Army

  • U.S. Department of State

  • U.S. Navy

  • U.S. Treasury

  • Volkswagen Company

  So vast is the reach of IDA that it would take hundreds of pages to describe the activities in which it is engaged, and IDA is fully described in my book on the role played by Institutions and Foundations in committing treason against the United States of America, which will be published early in 1992.

   

   

• RAND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

  
  Without a doubt, RAND is THE think tank most beholden to Tavistock Institute and certainly the RIIA’s most prestigious vehicle for control of United States policies at every level.

  
  Specific RAND policies that became operative include our ICBM program, prime analyses for U.S. foreign policy making, instigator of space programs, U.S. nuclear policies, corporate analyses, hundreds of projects for the military, the Central intelligence Agency (CIA) in relation to the use of mind altering drugs like peyote, LSD (the covert MK-Ultra operation which lasted for 20 years).

  
  Some of RAND’s clients include the following:

  • American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T)

  • Chase Manhattan Bank

  • International Business Machines (IBM)

  • National Science Foundation

  • Republican Party

  • TRW

  • U.S. Air Force

  • U.S. Department of Energy

  • U.S. Department of Health

  There are literally THOUSANDS of highly important companies, government institutions and organizations that make use of RAND’s services, and to list them all would be an impossible task. Among RAND’s “specialities” is a study group that predicts the timing and the direction of a thermonuclear war, plus working out the many scenarios based upon its findings.

   

  RAND was once accused of being commissioned by the USSR to work out terms of surrender of the United States Government, an accusation that went all the way to the United States Senate, where it was taken up by Senator Symington and subsequently fell victim to articles of scorn poured out by the establishment press. BRAIN WASHING remains the primary function of RAND.

To summarize, the major Tavistock institutions in the United States engaged in brainwashing at all levels, including government, the military, business, religious organizations and education are the following:

• Brookings Institution

• Hudson Institute

• Institute for Policy Studies

• Massachusetts Institute of Technology

• National Training Laboratories

• Rand Research and Development Corporation

• Stanford Research Institute

• Wharton School at University of Pennsylvania

It is estimated by sources of mine that the total number of people employed by these institutions is in the region of 50,000 with funding close to $10 billion dollars.

via bibliotecapleyades.net

Posted via email from DailyDDoSe